Water Boards: municipal debt now up to R1.7bn

Wat gaan gebeur die dag wanneer die Waterrade nie meer hulle verpligtinge kan nakom weens die feit dat hulle nie vir hulle dienste betaal word nie? Geen organisasie kan bly voortbestaan as die debiteure nie ingevorder word nie.

1.  Die eerste logiese gevolgtrekking is dat hulle net eenvoudig nie meer die kwaliteit water sal lewer wat hulle normaalweg lewer met ander woorde die water kwaliteit gaan ons almal se gesondheid affekteer.

2.  Die tweede gevolg sal wees dat hulle glad nie meer water sal kan lewer nie. Aan daardie moontlikheid wil ‘n mens liewer glad nie aan dink nie.

Munisipaliteite het ook eenvoudig nie meer die geld om die Waterrade te betaal nie . Ngwathe en Mafube is nie eers in staat om Eskom te betaal nie waar gaan hulle nou die geld kry om die Waterrade te betaal? Dit geld ook vir tientalle ander munisipaliteite

Voorgaande is die reaksie van mnr Jaap Kelder van die Nasionale Belastingbetalersunie op ontstellende syfers oor Waterrade wat bekendgemaak is.

'n Verklaring van die Demokratiese Alliansie (DA) in dié verband volg hieronder.

The debt owed by municipalities to water boards continues to grow. In documentation presented to Parliament by the Department of Water and Environmental Affairs, it was revealed that R1.7bn was owed to water boards by municipalities at the start of the fourth quarter of 2010, with approximately R900m being debt in arrears.

The Democratic Alliance (DA) has been tracking this debt for eighteen months now, and the trajectory is heading one way: upwards. Over the same period the DA has been calling for action to be taken by National Treasury to ensure municipalities pay their debt in arrears. However, there has been no overall improvement. These debts are compromising the financial sustainability of many of the water boards, and this could potentially affect the future provision of clean water to the public as well as the ability of water boards to expand water infrastructure to areas where there is currently no access to running water.


From mid-2009 to late 2010 the debt grew by over R600m. As of 31 July 2009, R1.1bn was owed to water boards, of which over R525m was in arrears. As of the end of 2009, R1.2bn was owed to water boards, of which over R608m was in arrears. As of March 2010 approximately R1.4bn was owed to water boards, of which R704m was debt in arrears. At the end of June last year, R1.56bn was owed to water boards, of which R853bn was debt in arrears. It is evident that the arrears, that is, debt owing for more than thirty days, and in some of these cases, debt that has been owing for more than 120 days, is growing consistently. The situation is getting worse, not better.

It must be said that the problem of debt in arrears does not afflict all the water boards. Overberg Water, for example, is owed no debt that is in arrears. Amatola and Pelladrift Water Boards have relatively small amounts owing to them.

However, several of South Africa’s 13 water boards are burdened by massive amounts owing to them in arrears. For instance, Bloem Water is owed R59m of debt in arrears, Bothselo R57m, Bushbuckridge R200m, Sedibeng R232m and Lepelle Northern R288m.

The latest information provided to parliament does not provide the breakdown of which individual municipalities owe money to water boards. However, from the last reply to a parliamentary question on this subject, it is known that the ANC-run Bushbuckridge municipality is responsible for most of the debt in arrears to Bushbuckridge Water. Similarly the ANC-run Mopani District Municipality is responsible for the majority of the debt owed to Lepelle Northern Water and the ANC-run Matjhabeng municipality is the biggest offender when it comes to Sedibeng Water.

The Minister of Water and Environmental Affairs must ensure that the National Treasury, which has a mandate to mediate between water boards and municipalities in terms of section 44 of the Municipal Finance Management Act, continues to pressurise municipalities to pay their outstanding debts. There should be punitive measures taken against municipalities that are tardy in paying. One small success of Treasury intervention thus far is that Bushbuckridge municipality has agreed to pay an additional R2m a month to Bushbuckridge Water to help address its long-term debt. The Department of Water has expressed frustration that the unconditional grant that municipalities receive as part of the equitable share for the provision of water to poor communities, is often being used for purposes other than settling debt with water boards.
The Department of Water has also reported that water boards with financial problems often settle their own debts before considering payment to the Department for their purchases of bulk water, as they know the Department is unlikely to legally challenge the water boards. It is evident therefore that non-payment of debts by municipalities has a knock-on effect that must surely be compromising the sustainability of the water governance network.

The considerable amounts outstanding to some water boards increase the financial risk of these water boards, and compromise their ability to engage in capital expansion projects and could compromise the provision of water to the public. Unless there is a significant intervention now, the amounts owing to water boards will continue to grow.